I'll Never Fall in Love (with ideas) Again
With apologies to Burt Bacharach for liberating his song title, I want to develop the concept of the innovator as a cold hearted killer, a love 'em and leave 'm type more suited as the villain in a dime store novel more than the passionate, heroic leading man. Because people who fall in love with ideas, or products, often don't have the strength to do what they must. Create a new idea or new product that makes the old one obsolete.
Anyone who has worked as an innovator knows the risk. It's easy to fall in love with an idea. So many ideas are so perfect, so suited for the need or opportunity. But falling in love with an idea is dangerous. Falling in love with an idea means as an innovator you are too close to your ideas to evaluate them effectively, and will miss problems or conflicts in the idea. A good innovator must be as willing to rework ideas and yes, even kill ideas as he or she is to promote an idea. A detached aloofness is probably your best bet, emotion wise.
Falling in love with an idea, however, is an easily forgivable sin, while falling in love with an existing product or service is what stymies innovation and creates lethargy. Far too many organizations have far too many executives in love with ideas that, like fading soap opera actresses have starred in their roles for far too long. Falling in love with existing products or services isn't just dangerous, it's deadly. Look no further than Kodak for example. Kodak continued to stick with the fading actress of film, all the while courting the emerging actress digital, but never made the clean break. Too many people were entranced by film. Too many people were reliant on the business models, revenues and programs that film created. In the end, Kodak was wedded to a corpse, while a patient new bride waited to take its place. Now, that bride may find itself in the arms of another.
Innovators and executives need to be ruthless. In a training program today I asked the class "Who should force your own products into obsolescence?" There are only two possible answers - yourself or everyone else. If you fall in love with ideas or products, and ignore the signals of the market, you will suffer the same outcome as Kodak. If your innovation efforts can be as ruthless as JR Ewing, as cold hearted as Gordon Gecko and as decisive as Churchill, then your innovation efforts will not be in vain. If, on the other hand, you engage in a love affair with your ideas or your existing products, obsolescence will be your only friend.
Love the innovation process, love the creation of new ideas, love the exploration of customer needs. Act with reserve in the evaluation of ideas and be absolutely ruthless when considering the further life of existing products. Because that's how the firms seeking to disrupt your products will look at them.
Anyone who has worked as an innovator knows the risk. It's easy to fall in love with an idea. So many ideas are so perfect, so suited for the need or opportunity. But falling in love with an idea is dangerous. Falling in love with an idea means as an innovator you are too close to your ideas to evaluate them effectively, and will miss problems or conflicts in the idea. A good innovator must be as willing to rework ideas and yes, even kill ideas as he or she is to promote an idea. A detached aloofness is probably your best bet, emotion wise.
Falling in love with an idea, however, is an easily forgivable sin, while falling in love with an existing product or service is what stymies innovation and creates lethargy. Far too many organizations have far too many executives in love with ideas that, like fading soap opera actresses have starred in their roles for far too long. Falling in love with existing products or services isn't just dangerous, it's deadly. Look no further than Kodak for example. Kodak continued to stick with the fading actress of film, all the while courting the emerging actress digital, but never made the clean break. Too many people were entranced by film. Too many people were reliant on the business models, revenues and programs that film created. In the end, Kodak was wedded to a corpse, while a patient new bride waited to take its place. Now, that bride may find itself in the arms of another.
Innovators and executives need to be ruthless. In a training program today I asked the class "Who should force your own products into obsolescence?" There are only two possible answers - yourself or everyone else. If you fall in love with ideas or products, and ignore the signals of the market, you will suffer the same outcome as Kodak. If your innovation efforts can be as ruthless as JR Ewing, as cold hearted as Gordon Gecko and as decisive as Churchill, then your innovation efforts will not be in vain. If, on the other hand, you engage in a love affair with your ideas or your existing products, obsolescence will be your only friend.
Love the innovation process, love the creation of new ideas, love the exploration of customer needs. Act with reserve in the evaluation of ideas and be absolutely ruthless when considering the further life of existing products. Because that's how the firms seeking to disrupt your products will look at them.
Voted 2nd best innovation blogger two years in a row!
2 Comments:
I discovered your blog post via a link on a email from 'SmartBrief on Leadership' with the title: "Why innovators should be killers, not lovers".
Based on this title, I perceived the following commentary (Your Kodak example epitomizes the essence of the message in Clayton Christensen's classic: "Innovator's Dilemma". Kodak held on to old ideas too long and failed to appreciate the important of emerging ideas/threats.):
Why should innovators be killers, not lovers? Because an innovation champion can face relentless resistance from countless quarters. To truly drive innovation successfully, one must be prepared for battling through push back that can be fatiguing. Diplomacy and charm can be effective tactics for navigating alignment building, but even this approach can hit walls.
Driving innovation can be a marathon, plus at times the innovator must be prepared to fend off vicious wolf packs intent on devouring prey. While some innovation-resistors fail to see around corners and thus dismiss visionary innovation ideas, other innovation-resistors will perceive innovation as a threat, causing them to adopt a virtual life-or-death struggle to protect their turf or power. In its most extreme form, that push-back can manifest itself in devious efforts to sabotage innovation, as well as character assassinate innovators to decapitate the innovation leader.
In at least some instances, innovators must be prepared for virtually going to war on at least part of the journey toward launching and scaling. Until one goes through championing innovation - especially in a large corporate setting with entrenched, complex corporate politics - it's a reality that was almost inconceivable until experienced. Innovators - stock your pantry with Wheaties.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Post a Comment
<< Home